Please note:The SCons wiki is now restored from the attack in March 2013. All old passwords have been invalidated. Please reset your password if you have an account. If you note missing pages, please report them to webmaster@scons.org. Also, new account creation is currently disabled due to an ongoing spam flood (2013/08/27).
   1 17:29:35 *	garyo-home (n=chatzill@209-6-158-38.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com) has joined #scons
   2 17:29:49 *	GregNoel is no longer marked as being away
   3 17:30:33 <GregNoel>	Hi, Gary; Steven's not here yet; you've still got some time for the spreadsheet
   4 17:30:50 <garyo-home>	working on it...
   5 17:31:14 <GregNoel>	I've been watching
   6 17:32:35 *	stevenknight (n=stevenkn@72.14.224.1) has joined #scons
   7 17:32:56 <stevenknight>	hola amigos.  been a long time since I rapped at ya
   8 17:33:06 <bdbaddog>	:)
   9 17:33:12 <garyo-home>	Hi Steven.
  10 17:33:15 <GregNoel>	Hi, Steven; Gary's about half-way through the spreadsheet
  11 17:33:24 <garyo-home>	55%!
  12 17:33:25 <garyo-home>	:-)
  13 17:33:49 <GregNoel>	garyo-home, don't bother with the consensus lines; I can get them.
  14 17:34:00 <garyo-home>	ok
  15 17:34:28 <GregNoel>	stevenknight, hablas espanol?
  16 17:34:36 <stevenknight>	no
  17 17:35:03 <GregNoel>	how about jive?
  18 17:35:10 <garyo-home>	:-)
  19 17:35:12 <stevenknight>	it's a quote from one of The Onion's "regular columnists"
  20 17:35:24 <garyo-home>	The druggie one
  21 17:35:25 <stevenknight>	chump don' want no help, chump don' get no help
  22 17:35:28 <GregNoel>	Ah.  Never read them, I'm afraid
  23 17:36:13 <GregNoel>	anyhoo, should we start?
  24 17:36:21 <stevenknight>	sure
  25 17:36:25 <garyo-home>	sure, go ahead
  26 17:36:48 *	stevenknight rearranges his windows...
  27 17:37:13 *	GregNoel moves to a different screen
  28 17:37:15 *	stevenknight ...and curses Mac's click-to-focus
  29 17:37:55 <GregNoel>	I can't figure out why Gary's on the spreadsheet twice...
  30 17:38:19 <garyo-home>	because my laptop's open on the couch.
  31 17:38:43 <garyo-home>	not any more.
  32 17:37:58 <stevenknight>	2391:  consensus 2.1 p3 stevenknight?
  33 17:38:07 <stevenknight>	er
  34 17:38:15 <stevenknight>	2391:  consensus 2.1 p2 stevenknight
  35 17:38:48 <GregNoel>	yes, consensus, but should we contact David directly?
  36 17:39:16 <stevenknight>	works for me
  37 17:39:27 <garyo-home>	yes
  38 17:39:44 <GregNoel>	The reason I even mention it is that _none_ of the GSoC students are responding to my entreaties to fix their proposals.
  39 17:40:02 <stevenknight>	the one i18n guy kind of did
  40 17:40:04 <garyo-home>	Hm, that's not good.
  41 17:40:17 <garyo-home>	I've been behind on asking for updates myself.
  42 17:40:22 <stevenknight>	ditto
  43 17:40:30 <GregNoel>	but not to discuss here; we've got too much to do
  44 17:40:34 <stevenknight>	right
  45 17:40:49 <stevenknight>	2391:  consensu 2.1 p2 ask David, SK as backup
  46 17:40:54 <garyo-home>	perfect
  47 17:40:58 <GregNoel>	done
  48 17:41:10 <garyo-home>	1632 I'll take
  49 17:41:20 <GregNoel>	1632, consensus
  50 17:41:27 <stevenknight>	done
  51 17:41:38 <stevenknight>	2288: consensus
  52 17:41:46 <GregNoel>	yep
  53 17:41:45 <garyo-home>	2288 actually I think we should just close it.
  54 17:42:04 <GregNoel>	Hmm...  Yeah, I agree.
  55 17:42:13 <stevenknight>	works for me
  56 17:42:23 <stevenknight>	2288:  close invalid?
  57 17:42:31 <GregNoel>	ok, 2388, close worksforme?
  58 17:42:45 <stevenknight>	worksforme works for me
  59 17:42:54 <GregNoel>	my line....
  60 17:42:52 <garyo-home>	wfm is ok w' me too
  61 17:43:12 <GregNoel>	OK, I'll handle that.  next?
  62 17:43:22 <stevenknight>	2306:  consensus anytime p4 +Easy
  63 17:43:32 <GregNoel>	sigh, yes
  64 17:43:54 <garyo-home>	2363: mine
  65 17:44:04 <stevenknight>	2363:  consensus as well
  66 17:44:08 <GregNoel>	done
  67 17:44:15 <garyo-home>	I'll have some airplane time in a week, good time to knock off a few bugs
  68 17:44:20 <stevenknight>	2370:  consensus
  69 17:44:36 <GregNoel>	2370, done
  70 17:44:46 <stevenknight>	2374:  DUP, Greg to figure out specifics
  71 17:44:58 <GregNoel>	done
  72 17:45:31 <garyo-home>	2375: Greg, your call on schedule
  73 17:45:32 <stevenknight>	2375:  2.1, and add to DeprecatedFeatures
  74 17:45:59 <GregNoel>	hmmm...
  75 17:46:38 <GregNoel>	Yeah, I'll take care of it
  76 17:47:06 <stevenknight>	2376:  2.x p3 stevenknight
  77 17:47:17 <GregNoel>	done
  78 17:47:30 <stevenknight>	2377:  2.1 p3 Ludwig,+Easy
  79 17:47:34 <GregNoel>	done
  80 17:47:58 <GregNoel>	2379, I think we should ignore the rebuilds
  81 17:47:59 <stevenknight>	2379:  dup 1673, mark 1673 +Easy
  82 17:48:08 <stevenknight>	agree re: ignore rebuilds
  83 17:48:30 <garyo-home>	ok then, I'll take it.
  84 17:48:46 <GregNoel>	If anyone depends on it, they're sunk anyway; the only ones that would rebuild are those who don't care
  85 17:48:48 <garyo-home>	(I mean it's a dup)
  86 17:49:16 <garyo-home>	It'll cause rebuilds for anyone with two CheckLib calls.
  87 17:49:30 <garyo-home>	But I'm OK w/ that.
  88 17:49:49 <GregNoel>	Call it a feature, part of the upgrade to 2.0
  89 17:49:56 <garyo-home>	It's more autotools-like.
  90 17:50:20 <garyo-home>	2380: Steven?
  91 17:51:15 <stevenknight>	2380:  2.1 p3 +Easy
  92 17:51:17 <garyo-home>	(testcase just stats the files and checks the inodes, Un*x only)
  93 17:51:31 <stevenknight>	add a note re: needing a test case
  94 17:52:11 <stevenknight>	i could do it, but it would be good to try to recruit more people to +Easy issues
  95 17:52:16 <stevenknight>	maybe even the person who filed it
  96 17:53:01 <GregNoel>	I'll ask, but I'm not holding my breath.
  97 17:53:08 <garyo-home>	I'll send out an email to the list recruiting people to fix +Easy issues
  98 17:53:29 <GregNoel>	Good idea
  99 17:53:38 <GregNoel>	we also need a wiki page about it
 100 17:53:52 <garyo-home>	With a query like the bug party one?  Great idea.
 101 17:53:58 <GregNoel>	yep
 102 17:54:04 <stevenknight>	yes
 103 17:54:04 <garyo-home>	Can you do that?
 104 17:54:34 <GregNoel>	Er, if you were going to write a note, just write a wiki page instead?
 105 17:54:49 <garyo-home>	OK, I'll do both.  I'll look at your existing query for inspiration.
 106 17:55:01 <GregNoel>	(I'm a terrible writer, really.)
 107 17:55:36 <garyo-home>	2381: ask them to try vs_revamp
 108 17:55:46 <garyo-home>	(what's the vs_revamp status these days anyway?)
 109 17:56:09 <stevenknight>	languishing... :-(
 110 17:56:18 <GregNoel>	(later in the spreadsheet, he mentions that he's about to make a push)
 111 17:56:31 <stevenknight>	i think i have some time freeing up, though
 112 17:56:44 <bdbaddog>	Hey now. I fixed 1 bug on vs_revamp...
 113 17:56:45 <GregNoel>	It's the only thing holding up 1.3...
 114 17:56:48 <stevenknight>	it's blocking too much stuff
 115 17:56:48 <bdbaddog>	not totally stagnant..
 116 17:56:56 <stevenknight>	bdbaddog++
 117 17:57:49 <stevenknight>	2381:  1.3 p1 sk, will point them to vs_revamp
 118 17:58:00 <GregNoel>	done
 119 17:58:23 <stevenknight>	2382:  2.x p3 sk
 120 17:58:39 <stevenknight>	that sounds like the right timeframe to look at VS project generation
 121 17:58:39 <garyo-home>	good, I had no clue about it (scanner issue or something?)
 122 17:58:48 <stevenknight>	or reprioritize it relative to the rest of the big 2.x pile
 123 17:59:14 *	GregNoel is keeping out of it
 124 17:59:20 <stevenknight>	no, it's probably just dumping the CPPPATH strings into the .vcproj file
 125 17:59:30 <stevenknight>	without turning them into Nodes to expand things like '#'
 126 17:59:42 <garyo-home>	Ok, that would make sense
 127 17:59:17 <garyo-home>	2383: consensus
 128 17:59:55 <GregNoel>	2383, done
 129 18:00:13 <stevenknight>	2384:  GregNoel is my hero...
 130 18:00:22 <stevenknight>	one of 'em, anyway
 131 18:01:13 <garyo-home>	2385: frankly, let's just close as invalid.  Enough to do elsewhere.
 132 18:02:17 <stevenknight>	2385:  okay, I can go with that
 133 18:02:21 <GregNoel>	I'm in favor of invalid, but Steven has a point
 134 18:02:22 <stevenknight>	2385:  invalid
 135 18:02:39 <GregNoel>	done
 136 18:02:40 <stevenknight>	yeah, but is it really worth the time when it could be spent elsewhere?
 137 18:02:47 <garyo-home>	'zactly.
 138 18:03:03 <stevenknight>	2386:  invalid
 139 18:03:12 <garyo-home>	yes
 140 18:03:14 <stevenknight>	mention that he should explicitly do these once in a base Environment instance
 141 18:03:32 <stevenknight>	and then propagate that to the SConscript files that use it for the variants
 142 18:03:39 <stevenknight>	i can update
 143 18:03:47 <garyo-home>	great
 144 18:03:52 <GregNoel>	done
 145 18:04:10 <stevenknight>	2387:  2.1 p2 +Easy
 146 18:04:35 <GregNoel>	who?
 147 18:05:02 <GregNoel>	garyo-home, AppendUnique is a good idea..
 148 18:05:40 <garyo-home>	sure, but the patch as is is fine too (and a bit faster)
 149 18:05:55 <GregNoel>	good point
 150 18:06:23 <garyo-home>	I could do it with the OP checking the result if time permits
 151 18:06:33 <GregNoel>	Still need a sucke, ah, volunteer
 152 18:06:36 <garyo-home>	Or save it as a +Easy
 153 18:06:46 <bdbaddog>	what tools needed to test?
 154 18:07:06 <garyo-home>	dmd, I guess?
 155 18:07:05 <stevenknight>	how about we just put it in?
 156 18:07:08 <stevenknight>	DMD is kind of a niche
 157 18:07:30 <stevenknight>	if it does break someone it'll be readily identifiable and correctable
 158 18:07:32 <garyo-home>	steven: I've done that before, never had any trouble from it
 159 18:07:49 <GregNoel>	does it need a test?
 160 18:07:54 <stevenknight>	no
 161 18:08:07 <stevenknight>	for niche Tool modules like this we tend to go with their flow
 162 18:08:10 <GregNoel>	OK, I'm fine with Gary doing that, then.
 163 18:08:11 <stevenknight>	or at least we've done that in the past
 164 18:08:13 <garyo-home>	yes, but I think that's easy too, just see how many times it appears on the cmd line
 165 18:08:28 <stevenknight>	if you want to add a test, feel free
 166 18:08:31 <garyo-home>	:-)
 167 18:08:42 <stevenknight>	but i think the time's better spent elsewhere
 168 18:08:51 <garyo-home>	hm, good point.
 169 18:08:58 <garyo-home>	5 min vs 45 min.
 170 18:09:05 <garyo-home>	(no test vs. test)
 171 18:09:08 <stevenknight>	right
 172 18:09:02 <GregNoel>	right; 2.1 p2, gary, +Easy
 173 18:09:02 <stevenknight>	2387:  2.1 p2 garyo to integrate
 174 18:09:11 <stevenknight>	done
 175 18:09:13 <GregNoel>	done
 176 18:09:14 <stevenknight>	2388:  invalid
 177 18:09:20 <GregNoel>	done
 178 18:09:33 <stevenknight>	2389:  doc, i'll volunteer
 179 18:09:39 <garyo-home>	great
 180 18:09:59 <GregNoel>	done
 181 18:09:46 <bdbaddog>	2387 I can take if you want, does it need to wait til 2.1?
 182 18:10:02 <garyo-home>	No, anytime is fine!
 183 18:10:12 <garyo-home>	Thanks!
 184 18:10:19 <stevenknight>	okay, 2387:  2.1 p2 bdbaddog +Easy
 185 18:10:23 <stevenknight>	cool, thanks
 186 18:10:27 <GregNoel>	done
 187 18:10:52 <stevenknight>	2390:  worksfor me
 188 18:11:15 <GregNoel>	done
 189 18:11:42 <garyo-home>	2392 is another vs_revamp one
 190 18:12:15 <GregNoel>	2392, 1.3 p1 sk +VS
 191 18:12:19 <stevenknight>	done
 192 18:12:24 <stevenknight>	excellent work
 193 18:12:25 <garyo-home>	whew!
 194 18:12:43 <GregNoel>	I'm surprised we got through all of them so quickly
 195 18:12:44 <stevenknight>	and I still have a few minutes before shuttle stop
 196 18:12:50 <stevenknight>	lotta consensus in the pre-work
 197 18:12:54 <garyo-home>	next week same time, right?
 198 18:12:59 <GregNoel>	yes
 199 18:13:01 <stevenknight>	yes
 200 18:13:45 <GregNoel>	Although it's a bit early, I'm still under the weather (as you can tell from my typing) so I'm willing to stop here.
 201 18:14:02 <garyo-home>	Greg: I need sleep too.
 202 18:14:30 <GregNoel>	What's that?  I've only been sleeping 20 hours a day, and I'm still tired.
 203 18:14:56 <garyo-home>	Greg: ouch, do you have that sore-throat+exhaustion thing that's going around on the east coast?
 204 18:16:35 <GregNoel>	garyo-home, no, the 24-hour stomach horror that's lasted three days
 205 18:16:55 <garyo-home>	Greg: sorry to hear that.
 206 18:17:03 <garyo-home>	I'll sign off now, c u all later
 207 18:17:05 <stevenknight>	hope you're both feeling better
 208 18:17:10 <stevenknight>	see you next week
 209 18:17:31 <GregNoel>	cul, bye
 210 18:17:41 <bdbaddog>	l8r
 211 18:17:48 *	stevenknight has quit ("Leaving")
 212 18:18:23 *	GregNoel has been marked as being away
 213 18:38:43 *	garyo-home has quit ("ChatZilla 0.9.84 [Firefox 3.0.8/2009032609]")
 214 

BugParty/IrcLog2009-04-08 (last edited 2009-04-09 07:10:59 by ip68-7-77-81)