Please note:The SCons wiki is now restored from the attack in March 2013. All old passwords have been invalidated. Please reset your password if you have an account. If you note missing pages, please report them to webmaster@scons.org. Also, new account creation is currently disabled due to an ongoing spam flood (2013/08/27).
   1 17:18:54 *	garyo-home (n=chatzill@209.6.158.38) has joined #scons
   2 17:22:57 *	stevenknight (n=stevenkn@67.218.103.44) has joined #scons
   3 17:24:27 <stevenknight>	hey all
   4 17:25:42 <garyo-home>	Hi, Steven.
   5 17:25:50 <garyo-home>	Hi, Greg (?)
   6 17:26:00 <garyo-home>	Anyone else here yet?
   7 17:26:15 <stevenknight>	just got here myself
   8 17:26:23 <stevenknight>	haven't seen anyone else
   9 17:26:39 <garyo-home>	Looks like the bug list should be pretty short this time.
  10 17:26:49 <stevenknight>	yep
  11 17:37:21 <garyo-home>	Anyway... where's Greg?
  12 17:39:12 <stevenknight>	well, Greg entered his comments, shall we dive in and do what we can?
  13 17:39:24 <garyo-home>	Yes, I was just thinking that.
  14 17:39:46 <garyo-home>	2279: how about I integrate it, and we give Arve commit rights on his next patch?
  15 17:40:13 <garyo-home>	Unless you have swig.
  16 17:40:09 <stevenknight>	sounds good -- or actually,
  17 17:40:23 <stevenknight>	i may have been thinking about someone different for commit rights
  18 17:40:35 <stevenknight>	IIRC Greg's been talking with Ben Webb about becoming the SWIG guru
  19 17:40:49 <stevenknight>	I do have swig installed so could do at least a sanity check on it
  20 17:41:02 <garyo-home>	Oh, right.  Maybe we should let Ben check it then.
  21 17:41:15 <stevenknight>	okay, i'll follow up w/Greg and/or Ben
  22 17:41:28 <stevenknight>	and integrate it myself if neither of them has cycles
  23 17:41:25 <garyo-home>	good.
  24 17:41:30 <stevenknight>	done
  25 17:41:43 <garyo-home>	2281: I think you're right, error if no action.
  26 17:42:04 <stevenknight>	okay, 2.0 p3... me?
  27 17:42:10 <stevenknight>	since i spoke up...
  28 17:42:12 <garyo-home>	yes.
  29 17:42:33 <stevenknight>	2281:  2.0, p3, sk
  30 17:42:33 <stevenknight>	done
  31 17:43:00 <stevenknight>	2282:  1.3, p3, who?
  32 17:43:12 <garyo-home>	right, who.  I can do it, or maybe Greg would.
  33 17:43:31 <garyo-home>	Heck, count me in, I've done a bunch of doc already.
  34 17:43:39 <stevenknight>	okay
  35 17:43:43 <stevenknight>	2282:  1.3, p3, garyo
  36 17:43:44 <stevenknight>	done
  37 17:43:45 <stevenknight>	thanks
  38 17:44:04 <stevenknight>	2283:
  39 17:44:11 <garyo-home>	2283: we need to actually see the patch before we can do anything.
  40 17:44:15 <stevenknight>	do you see any significant downside to going with it?
  41 17:44:23 <stevenknight>	i looked and it seemed pretty reasonable to me
  42 17:44:38 <garyo-home>	Good -- no, as long as it doesn't break anything, why not.
  43 17:44:52 <stevenknight>	i wasn't sure what Greg's concerns are w.r.t. "special-case cross-compiling"
  44 17:45:15 <garyo-home>	I think he wants to specify cross-compilation at a toolchain level in a nice way.
  45 17:45:34 <stevenknight>	i see
  46 17:45:07 <stevenknight>	2.x p3 seem reasonable?
  47 17:45:13 <stevenknight>	right now those don't need to be assigned
  48 17:45:29 <stevenknight>	and we're going to have to have a big assignment party some time post 1.3 for those
  49 17:45:38 <garyo-home>	Yes, 2.x for all feature requests is good.
  50 17:45:42 <stevenknight>	not just as an implementation within a specific tool, right
  51 17:45:47 <garyo-home>	right.
  52 17:45:48 <stevenknight>	okay
  53 17:45:54 <stevenknight>	2283:  2.x, p3, TBD
  54 17:45:57 <stevenknight>	done
  55 17:46:16 <stevenknight>	2284:
  56 17:46:22 <garyo-home>	as you say, it's a dup.
  57 17:46:24 <stevenknight>	I'll DUP to 1914
  58 17:46:29 <garyo-home>	good!
  59 17:46:34 <stevenknight>	cool, done with the current issues
  60 17:46:35 <garyo-home>	that was quick.
  61 17:46:39 <stevenknight>	nice
  62 17:47:10 <garyo-home>	I spent some time on the 2005Q2 issues too.
  63 17:47:25 <stevenknight>	excellent, let's see if we can get through those
  64 17:47:40 <garyo-home>	1140: close as WORKSFORME.
  65 17:47:48 <stevenknight>	1140:  done
  66 17:47:50 <garyo-home>	1185: consensus WORKSFORME.
  67 17:48:08 <stevenknight>	1185:  done
  68 17:48:21 <stevenknight>	1187:  research, sk
  69 17:48:25 <garyo-home>	yup.
  70 17:48:42 <stevenknight>	1188:  research, sk
  71 17:48:47 <stevenknight>	close if confirm fix
  72 17:49:03 <garyo-home>	I actually tried 1188 and it worked.  ?
  73 17:49:11 <garyo-home>	But I had to make my own testcase.
  74 17:49:17 <stevenknight>	do you still have it?
  75 17:49:46 <garyo-home>	Maybe.  It was just foo.c conditionally including foo.h, iirc.
  76 17:50:11 <stevenknight>	with appropriate case change in the extension, i take it
  77 17:50:31 <garyo-home>	case change?
  78 17:50:34 <stevenknight>	you have to get it stored in the .sconsign file and then run again
  79 17:50:47 <stevenknight>	d'oh!  scratch my case change comment
  80 17:50:52 <stevenknight>	thinking about the next issue
  81 17:50:55 <garyo-home>	:-)
  82 17:51:02 <garyo-home>	Anyway, whatever you find there is OK.
  83 17:51:22 <stevenknight>	if you still have the test case handy, send it my way or attach it as a starting point
  84 17:51:30 <garyo-home>	Either close or post testcase and retriage.  I'll see if I have the testcase.
  85 17:51:49 <stevenknight>	even if it's already fixed, i'd feel better checking in a test to make sure it stays fixed
  86 17:52:07 <garyo-home>	Good point.
  87 17:52:22 <stevenknight>	1188:  research, sk, garyo to see if he has his test case
  88 17:52:23 <stevenknight>	done
  89 17:52:29 <stevenknight>	1193:
  90 17:52:40 <stevenknight>	1193:  1.3, p2, sk
  91 17:52:41 <garyo-home>	1193, p3 sk?
  92 17:52:46 <garyo-home>	yes
  93 17:52:52 <stevenknight>	done
  94 17:53:04 <garyo-home>	1194 you already closed.
  95 17:53:05 <stevenknight>	1194:  already fixed
  96 17:53:28 <stevenknight>	1198:  
  97 17:53:40 <garyo-home>	1198: do you really have to set PYTHONPATH if you install as non-root?
  98 17:53:50 <stevenknight>	not sure about that
  99 17:53:59 <stevenknight>	but maybe i'm misunderstanding the bug
 100 17:53:59 <garyo-home>	I don't think so, I do that on one of my Linux boxes where I don't have root and I don't think I set PYTHONPATH.
 101 17:54:14 <stevenknight>	i don't set it either
 102 17:54:29 <stevenknight>	but it sounds like the underlying problem is we don't do the right thing with installing the man page
 103 17:55:03 <garyo-home>	Right, forgot about that part.  Should be a separate issue IMHO, but anyway.
 104 17:55:20 <stevenknight>	ah, okay
 105 17:55:23 <garyo-home>	He wants us to install the man pages anyway.  That's reasonable.
 106 17:55:46 <stevenknight>	should I just re-title this issue, or open up a separate one?
 107 17:56:10 <garyo-home>	I'd close this one w/ explanation, and open a new one with a reference to this old one.
 108 17:56:17 <stevenknight>	okay, i'll do that
 109 17:56:22 <garyo-home>	great.
 110 17:56:36 <garyo-home>	That's that!
 111 17:56:41 <stevenknight>	1198:  open new issue, 2.0, p3 ?
 112 17:56:49 <stevenknight>	done
 113 17:56:51 <stevenknight>	excellent
 114 17:57:06 <stevenknight>	we're actually beginning to get this "consensus" thing down...  :-)
 115 17:57:15 <garyo-home>	Yes, it works well.
 116 17:58:04 <garyo-home>	There's probably a lot of scheduling discussions we could have right now, but I am pretty burned out and would like to go to bed.
 117 17:57:59 <stevenknight>	looks like you haven't had a chance to tackle 2005q1, shall we just push that off to next time?
 118 17:58:07 <stevenknight>	and go get other things done... :-)
 119 17:58:13 <garyo-home>	Yes, and let's do 2005q1 next time.
 120 17:58:14 <stevenknight>	okay, sounds good
 121 17:58:37 <stevenknight>	i'm going to try to get sgk_batch integrated into trunk and then kick out a checkpoint so it gets air time
 122 17:58:43 <stevenknight>	and then tackle integrating vs_revamp
 123 17:58:57 <stevenknight>	with another checkpoint for that
 124 17:58:56 <garyo-home>	+1 on both of those.  I will test them hard!
 125 17:59:22 <garyo-home>	I'll be able to test on my home Windows box once vs_revamp is out (I have VS2008 here)
 126 17:59:30 <stevenknight>	cool
 127 18:00:03 <stevenknight>	we've been working on a signfiicant refactoring of .vcproj / .sln generation
 128 18:00:34 <garyo-home>	OK, not my particular cup o' tea but some people like it.
 129 18:00:37 <stevenknight>	still a ways off, so not for 1.3, but I think it'll come with some good stuff for hard-core Windows developers
 130 18:00:41 <stevenknight>	yep
 131 18:01:25 <garyo-home>	OK Steven, see you later.
 132 18:01:39 <stevenknight>	garyo-home:  good night, thanks again
 133 18:18:03 *	stevenknight has quit ("Leaving")
 134 18:33:38 *	garyo-home has quit ("ChatZilla 0.9.84 [Firefox 3.0.5/2008120122]")
 135 

BugParty/IrcLog2009-01-07 (last edited 2009-01-08 02:02:56 by GaryOberbrunner)